Word Count 453 – 3 Minute Read
The Association Community is facing a significant challenge from the private sector. As one of my fellow consultants has reminded me, this isn't new, but in these disruptive times, it is more present. Venture capitalists (VCs) can harm the association community in several ways, primarily due to their profit-driven approach, which often clashes with the mission-driven focus of associations. Here are key concerns:
1. Shifting the Focus to Profit Over Purpose
Associations exist to serve their members and advance a mission, such as professional development, advocacy, or community building. When VCs invest in or acquire association-related organizations (e.g., technology vendors or service providers), they often prioritize short-term profitability over long-term member benefits, undermining the association's mission and values.
2. Increased Costs for Essential Services
VC-backed companies often focus on increasing revenue, leading to rising costs for association management systems (AMS), event platforms, learning management systems (LMS), and other technology. This disproportionately impacts smaller associations with limited budgets, reducing their ability to innovate or serve members effectively.
3. Monopolization and Reduced Competition
VCs consolidating industry providers through mergers and acquisitions can lead to monopolies or oligopolies. This reduces competition, stifles innovation, and limits associations' choices for service providers. Over time, associations may face fewer options and higher prices for tools critical to their operations.
4. Exploitation of Member Data
VC-backed organizations may see member data as a valuable asset to monetize. If data privacy isn't prioritized, sensitive member information could be sold or used to undermine trust between associations and their members.
5. Pressure to Scale Beyond Sustainability
VCs typically aim for rapid growth and scalability, which can pressure associations or their partners to expand beyond what is sustainable. This can result in overextension, loss of quality, or failure to address the unique needs of individual associations.
6. Erosion of Community and Collaboration
Associations thrive on collaboration and shared purpose. VC-driven entities might prioritize competition over cooperation, leading to fragmentation in the association community. This competitive dynamic can hinder collective advocacy and knowledge-sharing efforts.
7. Focus on Exit Strategies
VCs often invest intending to exit through acquisition or IPO. This short-term mindset can disrupt partnerships between associations and VC-backed companies, especially when new ownership doesn't align with the association's mission or needs.
Mitigation Strategies
Associations can mitigate these risks by:
Vetting vendors: Prioritize vendors whose missions align with the association's values.
Investing in member-owned solutions: Explore cooperative or nonprofit-owned technology and services.
Advocating for ethical practices: Work with vendors committed to transparency, data privacy, and fair pricing.
Strengthening internal capacities: Build internal expertise to reduce dependency on external providers.
By staying vigilant and strategic, associations can navigate these challenges while staying true to their purpose and mission.
Comments